Skip to content

Support JWT bearer grant type#3968

Draft
reinkrul wants to merge 5 commits intomasterfrom
support-jwtbearer
Draft

Support JWT bearer grant type#3968
reinkrul wants to merge 5 commits intomasterfrom
support-jwtbearer

Conversation

@reinkrul
Copy link
Member

@reinkrul reinkrul commented Jan 14, 2026

Fixes #3965

@qltysh
Copy link

qltysh bot commented Feb 2, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Qlty

Coverage Impact

⬇️ Merging this pull request will decrease total coverage on master by 0.03%.

Modified Files with Diff Coverage (8)

RatingFile% DiffUncovered Line #s
Coverage rating: C Coverage rating: C
auth/auth.go100.0%
Coverage rating: A Coverage rating: A
cmd/root.go100.0%
Coverage rating: B Coverage rating: B
auth/api/iam/api.go54.8%229-256, 794-795
Coverage rating: B Coverage rating: B
auth/api/iam/openid4vp.go100.0%
Coverage rating: B Coverage rating: B
auth/client/iam/openid4vp.go84.2%70-83, 261-262, 275-276
Coverage rating: B Coverage rating: B
auth/api/iam/access_token.go86.4%77-79
Coverage rating: B Coverage rating: B
auth/api/iam/validation.go77.8%47-48, 51-52, 57-59...
New file Coverage rating: B
auth/api/iam/bearer_token.go92.5%82-83, 109
Total81.2%
🤖 Increase coverage with AI coding...

In the `support-jwtbearer` branch, add test coverage for this new code:

- `auth/api/iam/access_token.go` -- Line 77-79
- `auth/api/iam/api.go` -- Lines 229-256 and 794-795
- `auth/api/iam/bearer_token.go` -- Lines 82-83 and 109
- `auth/api/iam/validation.go` -- Lines 47-48, 51-52, 57-59, and 81-83
- `auth/client/iam/openid4vp.go` -- Lines 70-83, 261-262, and 275-276

🚦 See full report on Qlty Cloud »

🛟 Help

  • Diff Coverage: Coverage for added or modified lines of code (excludes deleted files). Learn more.

  • Total Coverage: Coverage for the whole repository, calculated as the sum of all File Coverage. Learn more.

  • File Coverage: Covered Lines divided by Covered Lines plus Missed Lines. (Excludes non-executable lines including blank lines and comments.)

    • Indirect Changes: Changes to File Coverage for files that were not modified in this PR. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@woutslakhorst woutslakhorst Awaiting requested review from woutslakhorst woutslakhorst will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review woutslakhorst is a code owner

@gerardsn gerardsn Awaiting requested review from gerardsn gerardsn will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review gerardsn is a code owner

@stevenvegt stevenvegt Awaiting requested review from stevenvegt stevenvegt will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review stevenvegt is a code owner

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support JWT-bearer client assertions grant type in Nuts node

1 participant

@reinkrul